Friday, June 7, 2013

Andrew Jackson American Hero

Old Hickory was a real man. a real American who had the guts to stand up to the British Banksters.

Both pistols misfired in an assassination attempt on Jackson.

"I killed the bank!"    -- Andrew Jackson


  1. If watching ten minute chapters of this all important video is too much just know you did as little as humanly possible to prevent the tyranny....

  2. First one needs to know who and how and then they need to be inspired by understanding their country spawned Great Men who articulated the reasons with literal intelligence and profound perfection.

  3. Thank you for posting the Money Master’s video in small chunks; this allows me to find time to listen to them over and over. This video should be a requirement for those who hold American citizenship.

    1. Thank you for saying that.... I agree.... It should be in every school.... the video teachers play when they want some time to correct papers...

    2. surprisingly i learned a lot of that in 7th grade. Kudo's to Jackson, he was a good man. Too bad i cant say the same thing about Lincoln the usurper. His goal wasn't to abolish slavery, and from his actions, it wasn't to get rid of the bank. In fact what he did was for "UNION". What good is 1/2 a country when you can have the whole thing? He couldn't win the war with the bankers money, so he created his own "out of thin air" and as Taylor said "what choice will the people have" " it will be as good as any money" hell even Lincoln said " making money is the greatest creative prerogative of the government" so hi did it, and of course it was of no interest to the people... the people had no interest in it cause it was made of thin air, and as taylor said they didn't have a choice. So Lincoln wins the war, unites north and south, and abolishes NOT slavery, but slave masters that don't work for government. In turn thanks to Lincoln everyone is a slave to the green back.

    3. well this all goes to "intent" printing money out of thin air to wage war to subjugate and further a one hundred year conspiracy by the European elite.... not good...

      To print money to facilitate goods and services directly proportionate to society's needs to perpetuate commerce and free enterprise, especially as it pertains to encouraging intellectual property that is intended for the best of humankind... that is intent that with the best intentions for the most people...

      Fiat is not the problem... controllers are the problem... The masses need to controll by demanding real math feeds real opportunity and cements the base of the pyramid as master not the basin of a toilet...

    4. Diogenese - May I ask how old you are? It seems you have been reading a lot of reinvented history books, and have a lot of misinformation. What you say about Lincoln is pure bullschitt, thats how I know.

      These falsehoods come from revisionist history that has replaced the truth. Very dangerous territory to be wallowing in. Furthermore, this channel is beginning to sound like an Agenda by shill-types, trying to work on the minds of people, much like John did.

    5. actually most of what I posted came from "quotes" from the video posted, you in there own words. all I did was clarify. but you would have seen that if you actually did the work and watches the video. Again I'm familiar with the MO you read the one book they told you to read never check out the info or bother to ask questions, take the popular point of view so the majority wont challenge you, and dimwittedly pass it on as knowledge.

      BTW I'm 38

  4. all in good intentions, but the road to hell was paved with good intentions. As far as Fiat goes, it means "as told" or "authoritative sanction" witch means... protection of the ruling class. Fiat is the Voice of the ruling class or the controllers as you put it, and it IS the problem.

    1. Please explain to me how it is the elite does not control gold backed or silver backed or petro backed or force by bombing backed currency?

      Fiat again is as good as the people who administer the system...

      It works perfectly in many places. and if you keep watching you will see...

      paper money, coin or yak dung is to trade goods and services to keep a society or community eating, working and playing...

      Fiat is not the problem....

      Self serving sociopaths are the problem....

      How do you suppose for a very second a gold backed currency changes the power structure when the elite used fiat control to buy up all the gold and pay soldiers to conquer?

    2. They always had the gold and gave us fiat to facilitate everyone doing their dirty work and now they will take away fiat and issue currency backed by gold because they own the gold and you will see the entire world free enterprise shrink to rich and poor and the middle class will just vanish... they cement their dominance with commodity backed and that was always the plan...

      This is what is going on with Basil 3 and the Babylon 2 software and dinar.... the currency revalues are one of the last stages to digital currency and then microchip currency and Babylon is no accident...

    3. A strange statement from the lady at the window at the bank yesterday. When we asked her about foreign currency, she said just bring it in and we put it on your bank account, and then you can draw it from your account. Charge is $8 regardless of the amount, but of course we never mentioned iqd. But she did add, we don't do iraqi money tho. (so somebody has been calling them about it, not me)

      Anyhow, this indicates digital banking, and it also indicates they want your money logged into computer to track you.

    4. To me that indicates global banking... because before, you couldn't just deposit foreign currency... you had to exchange it. That does not forebode well, IMO.

      I guess, if the Iraqi dinar is excluded, it would lend some legitimacy to a potential revaluation... but i'm not a banker... there could be myriad underhanded reasons that it is excluded. But if you deposit it, you get the current exchange rate, which is the sucky one... so you would not want to do that and the bank is doing a solid by not accepting it.

      Just my thoughts.

    5. It makes no sense, in reflection. If you go to the bank with silver quarters, the bank credits you back in regular quarters, sans the increase. I got taken away again thinking a bank is going to do any thing other than what a bank does...

      AND... that leaves this:

      Why wouldn't the bank accept Iraqi dinars if they are a legitimate currency? That is a big question.

    6. Global banking is nothing new, where did Lincoln get the money to win the war? Follow it back to the roots. Fiat currency weather deposited or exchanged is still currency, and the bank NEVER does anyone a solid.

      This being said one can only come to one of two conclusions; 1) the Iraqi Dinar DOES NOT EXIST or... 2) someone has an agenda in prolonging hope in the Dinar reevaluation to propagate more sales while simultaneously diverting the attention of people who would otherwise be spending their time doing something useful, like thinking or learning.

      Well if this is true what you said Abby, I'm sure we would all love to know what bank it was so we can investigate this some more. That shouldn't be a problem, RIGHT?

    7. Apparently international banks like the bank of America may or may not exchange the dinar, its hard to tell at this time of night. banking HRs are closed, and I cant find any accurate info at this time.

      that being said fit into option 2

      but tomorrows a new day, we shall see.

    8. I don't know where Lincoln got his $$$, but i assume from the bankers... and they are international you-know-whats (think usury)... and the original pirates who instituted the admiralty laws... the rule of the sea, and corrupted our courts system. So, right on that.

      Why would Abby say it if it were not true? It appears Abby put away the hammer, i think you should too... not every issue is a nail... and we all have our own perceptions... the key is to meet at what is logical and true... and what is true is logical.

      Anyways... i am pretty sure the dinar does exist, because i have some... i think you might mean that it has no legitimacy, and that is becoming my issue... because not being able to cash it in and/or exchange it like any other currency does shoot up a flare.

      and if one bank is doing it, wouldn't all of them? This should be able to verify without benefit of a particular bank..

    9. haha if you watch the video up top somewhere near the end it talks about Lincoln getting the money he needed to win the war from foreign banks.

      Why would anyone say something that isn't true online? compulsive liar, low self esteem, teenager with something to prove, paid troll, propagandist... they could even just be wrong. I don't know take your pick. Hell I could even be wrong.

      Everything everyone says needs to be verified, not just Abby. We all need to do the work. that means questions however unpleasant, and whatever the tone. You speak of logic and truth well lets look at this logical equation... my first encounter with Abby and she makes no qualms about calling me an azzhole, not only that she has yet to provide one reason for doing so. I didn't see anyone coming to my aid, and I've yet to get an apology, not that I'm looking for one. Just keep the equation in your head 9 times out of 10 the guy that attacks without cause and brings nothing to the table is a troll, if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck more than likely its a duck.

      as far as the dinar existing, toilet paper exist to, but I cant pay my bills with it.

      on the banks... as I remember not all of them went bankrupt. I don't know what that implies.

    10. Huh?? Go back and read my statement, Diogenese. Or do you just speed read what is said?

      Diogenese, see you must be very very young and dont read old, real history. Its well known that Lincoln got the money for the war by initiating a TEMPORARY income tax. But then others sort of conveniently forgot it was temporary, kept dunning the people each year to 'pay their fair share' and the tax just continued.

      As for understanding the rest of what I said, you will have to learn to understand plain english.

      It is TODAY that banks will not accept dinar.
      TOMORROW may be a different story altogether.
      So I don't really know what you are even talking about.

    11. Again Abby watch the video. and for crying out loud stop wasting peoples time. obviously the age of logic and reasoning was lost on you. If you watch the video you can clearly see how I put it together. It adds up, unlike the dribble you spew. Even Geno the guy that posted did confront me on that.

      There is no speed reading what you say... in fact I read it a few times out of shock of how daft you are.

      And what is this BS ... today they wont except it tomorrow may be a different story. in other you cant prove it, and no surprise you don't really know what I'm talking about, the real shock would be if you asked the questions did the work.

    12. Diog, look you little azzhole, full of YOURSELF, thinking you really know-it-all, and coming in here suddenly and trying to take over the Blog, as IF we need YOU to 'guide US'.
      News for you: We are all way way ahead of you and you came to the party very very LATE. Get rid of your arrogance; it doesn't bode well in here.

      At least wait till you've lived awhile, before you spew your big mouth; you will be surprised at what all you dont know at all.

      Your last paragraph here tells us what an azz you are making of yourself, LOL.

    13. Abby provide evidence that I'm wrong. If not shut up. You like you your religion that is responsible for burning the library of Alexandria and stoning Hypatia for asking questions you don't want to hear the answers to. You attack me for stating things you can't prove because you refuse to do the work. and never provide evidence of me being wrong. you just state I'm wrong and call me an asshole. that doesn't make you right, it makes you a fool.

  5. sorry I'm new to blogging as of yesterday, I keep posting in the wrong spot.

  6. Well first I never said they didn't control all of it. Any currency they give Even if said to be backed by what ever they want to say it is backed by. It's still Fiat. It's still whatever they say it is. That is where i have a problem with it. I choose for myself what is valuable. As long the fiat government is calling the shots we will always be in the same situation. the only thing that stops it is self government. We always have a choice, some choose freedom, some choose slavery.

    No problem can be solved by applying more of the same consciousness that created the problem.

    Think about it. Why do we allow our lives to be contingent on what THEY say? I own me, You own you.

    Internal domain external chaos.

  7. Geno, I like you, I can see you mean well and are trying to figure things out. Much respect, I didn't come here to cause chaos, I came here to redirect focus to the real cause the problems we have today. and hopefully get people to govern themselves.
    Let's imagine even hypothetically that in the days of Andrew Jackson people stopped spectating the ruling class and joined him to ensure the right thing was done. Of course that didn't happen and look where we are.
    What are we waiting for? Could it be the second coming of Andrew Jackson? That's not going to happen, nobody is going to come to our aid. It's up to us to make a change.

    1. You aren't causing chaos you are debating and so am I... I feel I am right about what I am saying... I even think Abby may indeed be right about what she is saying... whether the Bible and Christianity is true there are billions of people alive and dead who perpetuated this Gog and Magog march to Babylon/Jerusalem, temple of the mount and a microchipped society some call the mark of the beast... it is awful hard to deny whether by self fullfilling prophecy or some strange secret society design hundreds if not thousands of years old the board game keeps handing us the results that the Bible says was going to happen.... the story is not waivering...

      The more evidence I see of organized evil, the more I believe in a Satanic being which makes me believe more in the opposite....


      Don't let debate discourage you, I am not angry although I sometimes feel anger at our inability to see what seems pretty apparent...

      You pretty much stated what I stated...

      Fiat is agreed upon money...whether coin or's people who have to demand a clear and open system...

      This is why I parted with 3 people and that story may or may not need to be told... I await the right moment and some sort of sign as to what to do... As I see it now, men who think they are doing good are quite mistaken...

    2. I know nothing of Abby before she attacked me last night. As I said, I'm new to blogging, but not debating. As for a sharp tongue I make no apologies for defending myself. It is after all my inherent right to do so. As you will see I don't attack first, but I wont run away either.

      As far as Satan goes, if you study the roots of language you will find out that Satan "chaktan" or however it is spelled, means "one who opposes" and is described as a force not a being, in a world full of morality, Satan is the tyrant. Adversely in a world full of tyranny Satan is morality. think of it being the line that divides yin and yang, without it Yin would eat itself and Yang would explode.
      we were born in conflict, and through conflict we grow.
      Without light we wouldn't know darkness, and without darkness we wouldn't know light. it is the contradiction of opposing forces that brings awareness and growth. if you have something to add or ever refute, I'd love to hear it :) I'll never bash you for your beliefs.

    3. There is no need to study the roots of language to know that Satan is lucifer, who is an Anti-Christ.
      And to say that Satan is morality?? Are you crazy??
      Satan is immoral to the core !!

      Diogenese - I am watching you....for 'shill-ness'.

    4. Abby... prove Satan is evil... with something out of the bible.

      Show me something i can't match with, say, a thousand things God did that are worse... for every one thing evil you show me Satan did... i'll show you one thousand evil things God did... One thousand eyes for one eye... let's go.

      And while you're searching... ask yourself why it so easy to find examples of God's evil acts, yet Satan's are so God damned hard to find.

    5. So says the one book you read and never questioned.

      Well you got me beat there, you do know it all, or at least all you will ever know. If you never question what you know you never be proven wrong. I'd tell you to look it up, but I think we all know you wont.

      You have yet to show any evidence or reasoning for any of the dribble you speak. Nothing to disprove or prove anything.

      I'm done trying, when you post something I'm just going to make a statement that is verifiable to disprove everything you say. Just so anyone else reading your dribble that doesn't know everything they will ever know can see you are full of it. then I'll leave you hanging in the vapid thin air you came from.

    6. Wanda - God did a LOT of destroying of people. God is a killer. He once opened up the earth and swallowed up 14,000 people all at once. He killed Saphira by dropping him/her dead. He struck the entire city of Soddom from above. He turned Lots wife into a pillar of salt, just for looking back on that City of sodomites. He caused the Great Flood and drowned all the people on earth, cept for Noah and his family.

      You want to call this 'evil doing by God', BUT what you overlooked is the REASON why He did it. Because they were EVIL and had to be destroyed.

      Furthermore, He is going to destroy everything evil that is ON this earth, once again. It is EVIL and only evil that God destroys. People have the opportunity to do GOOD, yet they choose to do evil.

      Like a rotten apple in a basket; even YOU would spot that rotten apple and throw it out, SO THAT it does not contaminate and cause the rest of the bushel to become rotten. That is how God operates, and it is a righteous thing to do. People made the choice to do evil, or wrong doing, so the result that was warranted.

      Genesis 6 clearly shows the REASONS WHY God brought the Great Flood of destruction:
      v.5 and God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth and that every imagination of the thoughts of his HEART was only evil continually.
      v.6 and it repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth and it grieved him at his heart. (God was sorry that he ever made mankind)

      v.7 and the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth....
      v.8 BUT Noah found grace (acceptableness) in the eyes of the Lord....

      It is not evil to destroy evil men. Satan on the other hand is the destroyer of them that are good, Godly, and righteous and choose to be and do what is upright. Satan despises mankind because man is a creation by God. Satan comes to kill, and to steal and to destroy (that which is good).
      (Note: today's big fad of marring the Body indicates the hatred of what God created. Piercings in the nose, lips and belly buttons are further indications, all engineered by satan. And recently girls doing salt burning on their skin. Cutting themselves, etc.)

      Conversly, 2 Thess. 2:9 clearly tells us the evilness of Satan: even him whose coming is after the working of Satan, with all power and signs and LYING wonders
      10. and with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved

      John 10:10 the thief (satan) comes not but to steal,and to kill,and to destroy. I AM (Jesus) come that they might have Life, and that they might have it more abundantly (eternal life)

      Rev. 20 and I saw anangel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand...and he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent which is the Devil and Satan, and bound him a thousand years (in the near future)
      3. and cast him into the bottomless pit and shut him up so that he should deceive the nations no more....
      (again, in the very near future; not yet happened)

      So you see, it is not just about killing, but it is about WHY the killing. To understand this reasoning, one must first distinguish the difference between evil people, and righteous people. We have both kinds; we are not all the same. And we must face the fact that some people are just downright evil. Period.

  8. Abby, the income tax began in 1913 with the passing of the Federal Reserve Act under Wilson. Lincoln created the Greenback backed by the government to side step borrowing the money for the war from the banks. Watch part 8 at least.

    1. from wiki

      The Sixteenth Amendment (Amendment XVI) to the United States Constitution allows the Congress to levy an income tax without apportioning it among the states or basing it on Census results. This amendment exempted income taxes from the constitutional requirements regarding direct taxes, after income taxes on rents, dividends, and interest were ruled to be direct taxes in Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. (1895). It was ratified on February 3, 1913.

    2. Good stuff Geno, I hope that isn't revisionist history. I hear that stuff is bad. :P

    3. Geno, yer right. Well, hey I got my dates mixed up.
      I was thinking Lincoln did a temp tax, tho it was not The Tax Act, true, lol. I got greenbacks and tax mixed up there.

      But now, its time to get rid of it. And did you know that inside the IRS Agents handbook, it says 'the tax in voluntary, but don't let anyone see this book'.

      (Just another part of the great deceiving of the nations)
      Thx for the correction.

  9. According to the whole Bible, there is an adversary called Satan. His presence is consistently mentioned from Genesis to Revelation. He tries to upset God's plans but he seems to be tethered and can only go as far as God allows. Satan has the power to test us and tempt us but we have the option to resist. (See James 4: 7)

    Hmmmmm... Satan is the adversary of God's plans.
    Sounds good to me. Satan has the power to test us and tempt us.... o0o0o0o0o00o, cue up the eerie music here !!!

    Abby, if God is so all powerful, how come i can break all of his commandments in about a half an hour... or less? That doesn't sound all powerful to me, that sounds like two + two = five.

    1. Then how come santa claus can fit down a chimney?

    2. Because of magic mushrooms, my friend. That is the true story of Satan/Santa and where cardinals derived the get up they wear... tis all true... easter eggs and... watch this:

      Thousands of years ago, in the pre monarchic era, sacred plants and other entheogenic substances where politically correct and highly respected for their ability to bring forth the divine, Yahweh, God, The Great Spirit, etc., by the many cultures who used them. Often the entire tribe or community would partake in the entheogenic rites and rituals. These rites were often used in initiation into adulthood, for healing, to help guide the community in the decision process, and to bring the direct religious experience to anyone seeking it.

      In the pre literate world, the knowledge of psychedelic sacraments, as well as fertility rites and astronomical knowledge surrounding the sun, stars, and zodiac, known as astrotheology, were anthropomorphized into a character or a deity; consequently, their stories and practices could easily be passed down for generations. Weather changes over millenniums caused environmental changes that altered the available foods and plant sacraments available in the local vicinity. If a tribe lost its shamanic El-der (El - God), all of the tribe's knowledge of their plant sacraments as well as astronomical knowledge would be lost. The Church's inquisitions extracted this sacred knowledge from the local Shamans who were then exterminated...It is time to recognize the fact that this Pharmacratic Inquisition is still intact and destroy it.

    3. Wanda, 'if God is so powerful,hows come I can break all the Commandments......''

      Wanda, God doesnt stop us from doing whatever we decide to do. We have a choice of whether we will do good, or do evil, or live wildly, etc.
      It is because of that choice that it is US that has to decide or choose which we will do. And THEN either reap the rewards for choosing to do righteousness.....or the consequences of doing wrong; evil.
      We are not made as puppets on a string. He will wait and see what we do, and proceed we have been forewarned already in the bible of the outcome in the end.

      Just as this world has Laws that tell us if we go much over the speed limit, then the consequences of that are already outlined for us. Now if we do it anyhow, then we know what we can expect; we have been forewarned ahead of time, and the 'speed limit is even posted in front of us', right?

      So, then why should we not expect God to also 'outline the speedlimit to us, ahead of time'?
      No surprises and we cant say 'oh gee, I didn't know that'.

    4. Wanda - First let me emphasize that the Catholic 'church' is NOT The Church. It is the house of satan through and through. It is a place established from Hell itself. Full of deception upon millions of gullible people.
      Secondly, there is NO plant, getting spaced out on such drugging effect from them, that is going to 'bring forth ANYTHING that is divine'. It is pure nonsense.
      In fact those so-called religions that think so, are actually causing God to turn his face FROM them.
      God tells us 'be of SOUND MIND and body'. Does that sound like it would bring Him forth? No.
      What it will bring forth is demonic spirits. And the bible tells us that 'satan comes AS an angel of light'. Pretending to be Light, but is really a deception; darkness at its darkest. I can and does often open one up to demon possession; a scarey place to go.
      Remember the bible story about demons being expelled from people, and they came out and went into a bunch of pigs, and the pigs ran right off a cliff?

  10. Abby... i'm waiting... all's i hear is crickets.

    1. Did you know there is a lot of evidence that points to the Black Mass was written and performed by catholic priest? I know I've read the satanic bible, and in Anton Szandor LaVey's own words, no self respecting Satanist would use the blood of baby in a blood ritual, the Satanist quest is power, and if any blood was needed in a ritual it would be their own. Power lays in the blood of the magi.

      But don't take my word on it. here is the wiki link that doesn't go right out and say catholics did it, but they do point more than one finger.

      Besides doesn't it sound like a familiar scare tactic used today?

    2. Well, for Christ's sake, the body, the blood... the iconic Christ nailed to the cross in each and every place your eye can span. It's trauma based mind control.

      I have read the Satanic Bible. It is basically about contracts and the honoring of such. Dark Satanist complain that Anton LaVey was not evil enough for their liking. I could argue that his book is not evil at all.

    3. That's funny cause I do argue the same. specially when you take into consideration the catholic history of war, lies, molestation, and general propaganda, then compare it with satanic history of opposing the catholic church. Then couple that with the body count caused by the church VS. the body count caused by Satanist.

      Not that I'm a Satanist, but there is a lot more clarity in the satanic bible than there is in the catholic bible, and none of it is based on believing in something you cant prove.

      To anyone that doesn't believe me, read it yourself, if not you have no business disputing it.

    4. Oh? So now we are being conned into some Satanic bible? Just what the hell is the Agenda coming to, in here?
      YOI !

    5. Diog - Just as I thought. You were raised in a barn by Generation X parents.

    6. Again abby bring some evidence to prove what you say.